Reber AS (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Patel AD (2008) Music, language and the brain. Effects of age of cochlear implantation on receptive and expressive spoken language in 3-year-old deaf children.
Moussard A, Bigand E, Clément S, Samson S (2008) Préservation des apprentissages implicites en musique dans le vieillissement normal et la maladie d’Alzheimer. McAdams S (1994) La reconnaissance de sources et d’évènements sonores. Kral A, Eggermont JJ (2007) What’s to lose and what’s to learn: Development under auditory deprivation, cochlear implants and limits of cortical plasticity. Jones MR, Yee W (1994) L’attention auxévènements auditifs: le rôle de l’organisation temporelle. Howard JHJ, Howard DV (1997) Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. 329–347įu Q-J, Galvin JJ (2008) Maximizing cochlear implant patients’ performance with advanced speech training pocedures. Précis d’Audiophonologie et de déglutition - Tome 1. J Acoust Soc Am 107(8W):1645–1658įerard D (2006) Rééducation de l’enfant sourd profond: oralisme.
Ear Hear 18(7):488–501ĭonaldson GS, Nelson DA (1999) Place-pitch sensibility and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. Boeck, Bruxellesĭawson PW, Clark GM (1997) Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant. Elsevier, Parisĭ’Alessandro C (2006) Analyse des différents stimuli auditifs: muique, langage et bruit. In: Guegen B (ed) Neurophysiologie du langage. (2006) Perception du langagechez les nourrissons. Br J Audiol 25(5):291–302Ĭhristophe A, Millotte S, et al.
MIT Press, Cambridge, MAīusby PA, Roberts SA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1991) Results of speech perception and speech production training for prelingually deaf patients using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. PUG, Grenobleīregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.īaddeley A (1993). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors.
In the last section, we will present how implicit learning has been used in this special field, the effects on both trained and untrained auditory perceptive tasks. At first, we will describe and analyze the principles used in the traditional approach of auditory education in deaf children. The goal of this chapter consists in presenting a therapeutic approach in deaf children’s auditory training using an implicit learning paradigm. This constitutes a condition of the construction of an auditory lexicon and the learning of language. In other words, the auditory training must help deaf children to extract perceptive characteristics from the auditory input. The goal always consists in maximizing the effects of hearing aids or cochlear implants, allowing the children to process the sounds (especially speech sounds) more accurately ( 9). Auditory training constitutes an important part of the speech therapy addressed to the deaf children and must start as soon as possible. The second assessment concerns the way speech disorders are treated: new technologies are not linked to any change in the way speech therapy is delivered, particularly in the field of auditory training. However, a great variability in their spoken language skills is observed ( 12) and first attributable to the well-known effect of the age of auditory rehabilitation ( 15– 22). Deaf children are, earlier than in the past, identified and can benefit of new and highperformance devices (as cochlear implants or digital hearing aids).